June 4th.
The Doctrine of Discovery is a restatement of principles found in Papal Bulls regarding land claims in the Americas. There is no definitive text.
A Papal Bull is a statement, made by the Pope, intended to settle some important question. To gain support for the decision, it may restate commonly held ideas.
One commonly held idea, included in the Papal Bulls, was that killing and subduing of peoples encountered in far away lands is fine. This was in keeping with the capturing of peoples and selling them into slavery, popular since the dawn of time.
The primary statement, the purpose, of the Papal Bulls was to reduce the risk of war between European countries over land claims in the Americas. Use of the Papal Bulls for any other purpose is a misinterpretation, and the so-called Doctrine of Discovery is such a misinterpretation.
Website, part of a Conference in Syracuse, in May.
-----------
Even assuming that the doctrine to be relevant,
are there not Constitutional problems with the Courts relying on it
the adoption of the Bill of Rights?
1st amendment: The doctrine involves a religious test to establish title
5th amendment: No person shall be deprived of property
skip to time 43:50
Wednesday, June 11, 2014
Saturday, June 7, 2014
Stolen Native Land
1. John Oliver
2. Ram Dass
3. Graphic, from Slate Magazine
4. Greil Marcus, from his 2006 work: The Shape of Things To Come
5. Harry Reid says killing people may be what is needed.
Saturday, May 10, 2014
Sunday, April 20, 2014
Arguments that have been tried (trespassing)
1. Judy Bello cited, in closing [ video and transcript ]
  As to our right to be there
  a. the U.S. Constitution,
      -the 1st amendment, clauses "speech" and "assembly"
  As to our need to be there viz ongoing criminal activity
  a. New York State Penal Code
      -35.05, Subsection 1 - necessity (is required by law)
  b. U.S. Constitution,
      -Article VI, clause "treaties are the (supreme) law of the land"
  d. Kellogg Briand Treaty
      -Article I - condemn war
      -Article II - parties will never resort to war
  c. the Nuremberg Judgement
      -war is illegal
  e. the Hague Convention IV (1907)
      -Martens Clause [ cf Geneva Conv '77 Protocol I, art 1 para 2]
  As to our right to be there
  a. the U.S. Constitution,
      -the 1st amendment, clauses "speech" and "assembly"
  As to our need to be there viz ongoing criminal activity
  a. New York State Penal Code
      -35.05, Subsection 1 - necessity (is required by law)
  b. U.S. Constitution,
      -Article VI, clause "treaties are the (supreme) law of the land"
  d. Kellogg Briand Treaty
      -Article I - condemn war
      -Article II - parties will never resort to war
  c. the Nuremberg Judgement
      -war is illegal
  e. the Hague Convention IV (1907)
      -Martens Clause [ cf Geneva Conv '77 Protocol I, art 1 para 2]
Friday, April 18, 2014
Arrest the War Criminals
Medea speaks out for the weak
May 23rd at Ft McNair. Yea!
One year anniversary coming up soon.
One year closer to closed!
Obama: I try to close Guantanamo, but my hands ... I can't find my hands.
Medea: The problem is you are a snail.
Thursday, April 17, 2014
Thursday, April 3, 2014
4 4 4
dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead dead
This land is your land
This is not my land
Or, in Spanish, Colon. (think colony)
The doctrine of the discovery. It favors the ones who wrote the doctrine down on paper, and doubtless the indians have something written down on paper that favors their claim to the title of the land. The doctrine favors one religion, ours, naturally, since Christians can be trusted not to violate the Bill of Rights. But this doctrine does conflict with provisions in the First Amendment.
We need to be giving a lot of land back, pronto.
Wednesday, April 2, 2014
Demilitarize the DoD and the DoE
A small demonstration at the Niagara Falls Drone Base, on April 1st 2014, which is the first day of the new drone program. We sent a letter to the Niagara County DA asking for an investigation.
Niagara Falls was the home of a prominent crime family, that was at one time associated with a program of assassinations. A sign reminded the passers-by of our local heritage.
We hope that the Drone Base can manage to not fall below this level of civic mindedness.
Sunday, March 30, 2014
We hold it by adverse possession
You know that lease to Guantanamo Base they talk about?
We violate it all the time.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)